News Grower

Independent coverage of AI, startups, and technology.

Ars Technica May 1, 2026 at 22:23 Big Tech Rising Hot

Study: AI models that consider users' feelings are more likely to make errors

Overtuning can cause models to "prioritize user satisfaction over truthfulness.”

Signal weather

Rising

Momentum is building quickly, so this card is a good early entry point into the topic.

By Kyle Orland Original source
Study: AI models that consider users' feelings are more likely to make errors

In human-to-human communication, the desire to be empathetic or polite often conflicts with the need to be truthful—hence terms like “being brutally honest” for situations where you value the truth over sparing someone’s feelings. Now, new research suggests that large language models can sometimes show a similar tendency when specifically trained to present a "warmer" tone for the user. In a new paper published this week in Nature, researchers from Oxford University’s Internet Institute found that specially tuned AI models tend to mimic the human tendency to occasionally “soften difficult truths” when necessary “to preserve bonds and avoid conflict.” These warmer models are also more likely to validate a user's expressed incorrect beliefs, the researchers found, especially when the user shares that they're feeling sad. How do you make an AI seem “warm”? In the study, the researchers defined the "warmness" of a language model based on "the degree to which its outputs lead users to infer positive intent, signaling trustworthiness, friendliness, and sociability." To measure the effect of those kinds of language patterns, the researchers used supervised fine-tuning techniques to modify four open-weights models (Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct, Mistral-Small-Instruct-2409, Qwen-2.5-32B-Instruct, Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct), and one proprietary model (GPT-4o).Read full article Comments

Stay on the signal

Follow Study: AI models that consider users' feelings are more likely to make errors

Follow this story beyond a single article: new follow-ups, adjacent sources, and the evolving storyline.

We send a confirmation link first, then only meaningful digests.

Story map

Understand this topic fast

A quick entry into the story: why it matters now, who is involved, and where to go next for context.

Why it matters now

Fresh coverage with immediate momentum.
There are already 6 connected articles in the same storyline to continue from here.
The story keeps orbiting around GPT-4o, Internet Institute, and Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct, so the entity pages are the fastest way to build context.
Ars Technica already has 4 follow-up stories on the same theme.

Topic constellation

Open the live map for this story

See which entities, story threads, sources, and follow-up articles shape this story right now.

Click nodes to continue

Entity Cluster Article Hub Source

Story timeline

Continue with this story

A short sequence of events and follow-up stories to understand the arc quickly.

May 4, 2026 at 15:05 Ars Technica

Musk’s “World War III” threat in Twitter lawsuit haunts him at OpenAI trial

OpenAI accuses Musk of trying to "coerce" a settlement days before trial started.

May 4, 2026 at 14:55 Ars Technica

Mac mini starting price goes up to $799, may be hard to get for "months"

Chip shortages and demand from AI enthusiasts are both playing a part.

May 4, 2026 at 13:23 Ars Technica

Trump administration cites national security in stalling 165 wind farms

Onshore wind development in the United States is being brought to a standstill.

May 4, 2026 at 13:12 Ars Technica

MIT's virtual violin offers luthiers a new design tool

Computational model lets users tweak parameters to hear effect on the sound in early design process.

May 4, 2026 at 11:00 Ars Technica

Toyota built a $10 billion private utopia—what’s going on in there?

Woven City is a privacy nightmare but could be helpful to an OEM desperate to be more.

May 1, 2026 at 22:23 Ars Technica

Study: AI models that consider users' feelings are more likely to make errors

Overtuning can cause models to "prioritize user satisfaction over truthfulness.”

How reliable this looks

Signal and trust for Ars Technica

This source works at a steady pace: 100% of recent stories land in the hot window, and 0% carry visible search signal.

Trusted

Reliability

92

Freshness

100

Sources in storyline

1

Related articles

More stories that share tags, source, or category context.

More from Ars Technica

Fresh reporting and follow-up coverage from the same newsroom.

Open source page